header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 September 2007 / A Mcgee , P Hughes , M Friston , M Smith
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs privilege

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

In the first of two articles, the costs team at Kings Chambers explains how privileged material can be disclosed in costs litigation

Costs litigation is litigation without disclosure of the type familiar in other civil litigation. This is because the subject matter of the assessment is, by its nature, often privileged.

With certain narrow exceptions, the court has no power to order a party to disclose privileged material. There are, however, two (linked) mechanisms by which privileged material may come before the court; these are by way of filing the relevant material at court (“filing”) and by way of “election”.

FILING

The costs practice direction (CPD), supplementing Pts 43 to 48 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), states at s 40.11 that, unless the court directs otherwise, the receiving party must file with the court the papers in support of the bill not less than seven days before the date for the detailed assessment and not more than 14

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll