header-logo header-logo

16 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Could Brexit negotiations stall?

Government could be forced to request a break in Brexit negotiations

The government could be forced to request a break in the Brexit negotiations if the relationship between the Conservatives and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) sours, a constitutional expert has warned.

A ‘confidence and supply’ agreement between the two parties is currently being negotiated, amid mounting speculation that the Queen’s Speech, scheduled to take place on 19 June, may need to be postponed. Whether or not it is, the UK is due to begin its Brexit negotiations on the same day.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Neil Parpworth, Leicester De Montfort Law School, says: ‘If this informal relationship falters and “significant doubt” emerges as to the government’s ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons, The Cabinet Manual is clear that restrictions on government activity will apply.

Since this would entail observing “discretion in initiating any action of a continuing or long-term character”, it would clearly affect the government’s ability to continue negotiating with the EU. Thus, although the clock continues to tick following the triggering of Article 50, it is possible that the UK government may be forced to request that it be stopped sometime before March 2019, especially if another general election becomes necessary.'

Meanwhile, David Lidington, MP for Aylesbury, has replaced Elizabeth Truss as Lord Chancellor, in the prime minister’s cabinet reshuffle. Truss becomes the new Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and will attend cabinet. Lidington was previously Leader of the Commons, and served as Europe minister under Prime Minister David Cameron. According to the website, They work for you , which lists MPs’ voting records, Lidington campaigned to remain in the EU and voted against same-sex marriage. He is in favour of repealing the Human Rights Act 1998, putting him on a potential collision course with groups representing lawyers.

Nevertheless, he received warm congratulations from both the Bar Council and Law Society. Lidington said he looked forward to ‘working with the Lord Chief Justice and his fellow judges in the months ahead, to ensure that justice is fairly administered and robustly defended’.

Issue: 7750 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll