header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 November 2024 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Opinion , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

OPG: Could do better

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
It’s time to improve the Office of the Public Guardian register, writes Ann Stanyer

The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) register is relied on by essential services and the public to find out whether an individual has a power of attorney or a deputyship order registered on the register. What we are finding is that the register is not being kept up to date. Why is this, and what can be done to remedy it?

Establishing & maintaining the register

Section 9 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) provides that a lasting power of attorney (LPA) is not created unless it is made and registered in accordance with the Act. MCA 2005 established the OPG, one of whose roles is to establish and maintain a register of lasting powers of attorney and of orders appointing deputies. By virtue of MCA 2005, Sch 4, an enduring power of attorney (EPA) must also be registered on the onset of subsequent mental incapacity of the donor.

At present, an application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: 40 years on, has PACE lost its edge?
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
NLJ this week: Stress-testing the City
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll