header-logo header-logo

30 April 2015
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Could “registrars” save civil justice?

Legal campaign group Justice has proposed a radical new system of dispute resolution.

A Justice working party this week recommended that “lower level” qualified and trained dispute resolution officers (to be known as registrars) be introduced to deal with the bulk of cases in the civil courts and tribunals. The registrar would identify issues, correct procedure and necessary evidence in each case, and resolve many of the disputes at an early stage through neutral evaluation and mediation. Only cases requiring high-level judicial expertise would be referred on to a judge.

Claimants and defendants would be given extra support from an “integrated online and telephone platform” providing legal information and advice.

The radical suggestion is made in Justice’s report, Delivering Justice in an Age of Austerity, which bemoans the fact that cuts to legal aid and law centres has pushed access to legal advice and representation out of reach for most people at exactly the time when demand is increasing due to cuts to welfare benefits and front-line services.

Sir Stanley Burnton, chair of the Justice working party, says: “Our recommendations, if implemented, will ensure that ordinary people do have genuine and real access to justice, and in the medium term will lead to a less costly system of justice in our country.”

However, Justice was keen to emphasise that it does not endorse the cuts to legal aid nor seek to justify further cuts.

Justice director Andrea Coomber says: “Legal aid continues to be critically important in the endeavour to ensure access to justice for all.”

Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll