header-logo header-logo

Could “registrars” save civil justice?

30 April 2015
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal campaign group Justice has proposed a radical new system of dispute resolution.

A Justice working party this week recommended that “lower level” qualified and trained dispute resolution officers (to be known as registrars) be introduced to deal with the bulk of cases in the civil courts and tribunals. The registrar would identify issues, correct procedure and necessary evidence in each case, and resolve many of the disputes at an early stage through neutral evaluation and mediation. Only cases requiring high-level judicial expertise would be referred on to a judge.

Claimants and defendants would be given extra support from an “integrated online and telephone platform” providing legal information and advice.

The radical suggestion is made in Justice’s report, Delivering Justice in an Age of Austerity, which bemoans the fact that cuts to legal aid and law centres has pushed access to legal advice and representation out of reach for most people at exactly the time when demand is increasing due to cuts to welfare benefits and front-line services.

Sir Stanley Burnton, chair of the Justice working party, says: “Our recommendations, if implemented, will ensure that ordinary people do have genuine and real access to justice, and in the medium term will lead to a less costly system of justice in our country.”

However, Justice was keen to emphasise that it does not endorse the cuts to legal aid nor seek to justify further cuts.

Justice director Andrea Coomber says: “Legal aid continues to be critically important in the endeavour to ensure access to justice for all.”

Issue: 7650 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll