header-logo header-logo

Counsel of perfection

16 August 2007 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Richard Harrison suggests ways in which barristers can ensure repeat instructions from solicitors

Despite the rise of the solicitor advocate and the emergence of the advocacy department in some larger litigation firms, it remains my view that the best resource for a client engaged in the litigation process is an appropriately constituted team of solicitors and barristers. This article is not about my reasons for that view, but about how members of the Bar can ensure that they cross a solicitor’s radar more than once. It provides practical tips on how to get on with instructing solicitors.

Disclaimer time: any clerks to whose attention this is drawn and who know me will have had their barristers instructed by me or my firm on a repeat basis. Therefore those barristers will probably have passed the tests suggested.

INITIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND CONFERENCE

One of the obvious arguments for instructing counsel is specialist expertise. Another, just as important, is objectivity. However, the instruction of an external specialist should not prevent solicitor and counsel being seen by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll