header-logo header-logo

Court clarifies duties to protect unaccompanied children

14 June 2023
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
Unaccompanied children housed in Home Office-run hotels are protected in full by the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the High Court has held.

Ruling last week in Article 39 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWHC 1398 (Fam), Mrs Justice Lieven held that local authorities have full powers and duties to protect such children, under ChA 1989.

Children’s charity Article 39 sought to trigger the court’s inherent jurisdiction to make wardship orders in relation to several unaccompanied asylum-seeking children who have gone missing from Home Office-run hotels in Brighton and Hove. It successfully argued the Home Office had no power to house the children.

Concerns were raised following reports that children were going missing. The court heard evidence that 76 children went missing, of which 22 are now 17 years old, and one is 16 years old, while others have been located, leaving 23 under-16-year-olds still missing.

Delivering judgment, Lieven J said the court’s inherent jurisdiction, while ‘very broad’, should not be used where there were statutory powers in place to do the same job.

‘Lying behind this proposition is the fundamental constitutional principle that where there is a statutory scheme, the court should only use the inherent jurisdiction if there is a lacuna,’ Lieven J said. She held the children were the responsibility of a local authority, and the fact they were missing and therefore it was not possible to know which local authority was responsible did ‘not arise because of a lacuna in the statutory scheme’.

Carolyne Willow, director at Article 39, said: ‘This judgment has brought vital clarity to a wholly unacceptable situation where extremely vulnerable children have been treated as being in “legal limbo”, outside the protection of [ChA 1989]. That was a fiction which unforgivably exposed children to serious harm.’

Issue: 8029 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll