header-logo header-logo

Court fees to soar

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-detail

Courts

Lawyers have hit out at plans to hike civil court fees.

The plans, which would more than triple fees for many magistrates’ and other civil court matters, are set out in the Ministry of Justice consultation paper, Civil Court Fees 2008.

The fee for service by bailiff of an order to attend court would rise from £30 to £100. The fee for filing a request for detailed assessment where the party is legally aided would increase from £105 to between £300 and £5,000, and the fee for applying for a charging order would rise from £55 to £100. Commencement of committal applications in existing proceedings would attract a fee of £250 rather than the current £90.

Paul Marsh, Law Society President, says: “Civil Court fees are in danger of becoming unreasonable and preventing access to justice.

“Such increases would be more palatable if there was a visible benefit as, despite fee increases, courts continue to be under resourced. This leads to delay and that in turn results in court users facing increased solicitor’s costs.”

In 2007/08, court fees raised £472m, 78% of the £607m cost of running the civil and family courts.

The Ministry of Justice document says the underlying goals of full-cost recovery and raising income are “not in question”.

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll