header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-detail

Court fees to soar

Courts

Lawyers have hit out at plans to hike civil court fees.

The plans, which would more than triple fees for many magistrates’ and other civil court matters, are set out in the Ministry of Justice consultation paper, Civil Court Fees 2008.

The fee for service by bailiff of an order to attend court would rise from £30 to £100. The fee for filing a request for detailed assessment where the party is legally aided would increase from £105 to between £300 and £5,000, and the fee for applying for a charging order would rise from £55 to £100. Commencement of committal applications in existing proceedings would attract a fee of £250 rather than the current £90.

Paul Marsh, Law Society President, says: “Civil Court fees are in danger of becoming unreasonable and preventing access to justice.

“Such increases would be more palatable if there was a visible benefit as, despite fee increases, courts continue to be under resourced. This leads to delay and that in turn results in court users facing increased solicitor’s costs.”

In 2007/08, court fees raised £472m, 78% of the £607m cost of running the civil and family courts.

The Ministry of Justice document says the underlying goals of full-cost recovery and raising income are “not in question”.

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll