header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-detail

Court fees to soar

Courts

Lawyers have hit out at plans to hike civil court fees.

The plans, which would more than triple fees for many magistrates’ and other civil court matters, are set out in the Ministry of Justice consultation paper, Civil Court Fees 2008.

The fee for service by bailiff of an order to attend court would rise from £30 to £100. The fee for filing a request for detailed assessment where the party is legally aided would increase from £105 to between £300 and £5,000, and the fee for applying for a charging order would rise from £55 to £100. Commencement of committal applications in existing proceedings would attract a fee of £250 rather than the current £90.

Paul Marsh, Law Society President, says: “Civil Court fees are in danger of becoming unreasonable and preventing access to justice.

“Such increases would be more palatable if there was a visible benefit as, despite fee increases, courts continue to be under resourced. This leads to delay and that in turn results in court users facing increased solicitor’s costs.”

In 2007/08, court fees raised £472m, 78% of the £607m cost of running the civil and family courts.

The Ministry of Justice document says the underlying goals of full-cost recovery and raising income are “not in question”.

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll