header-logo header-logo

02 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Bar Chair urges government to give immediate support to the Bar

The Bar Council surveyed heads of chambers at 262 sets, with 145 responses to date. The main concerns raised were interruption to court work, inability to generate income and lack of cash flow to pay current costs

More than half of chambers say they could not survive more than six months without financial aid, if current circumstances persisted, and 81% could not last a year.

However, less than a quarter of chambers intend to take up the government’s Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS)―heads of chambers were uncertain about whether they would qualify for the scheme as well as what the terms entailed and what level of debt would result.

The survey uncovered grim news for those poised to begin their careers. Some 30% of chambers are changing their plans for pupillage starting in 2020 or 2021, and will or may not be taking pupils as planned. A further 24% are currently unsure, and continue to review the position.

Criminal law is the most affected area―two thirds of chambers said they could not survive six months and 90% could not last a year. 60% of criminal chambers are furloughing clerks and other staff, more than half are taking urgent measures such as renegotiating their lease, and 36% are changing their plans for pupillage, while a further 22% are unsure.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘We continue to urge the Ministry of Justice and government to give immediate support to the Bar, especially those in the early stages of their practice and those doing publicly funded work.

‘Whilst the measures introduced last week by the Chancellor of the Exchequer to help the self-employed were welcome, the self-employed Bar and chambers have needs that have not been addressed. Having canvassed the Bar through our survey, we have identified consistent concerns that chambers are facing, which we have raised as a matter of urgency with the government. We continue to press for action on these issues.’

In particular, the Bar Council points out that pupils and the most junior tenants are not eligible for hardship relief as first six pupils are not categorised as either employed or self-employed, and new tenants do not have a 2018/19 tax return. It expresses concern that parents returning from parental or adoption leave may lack a tax return for last year or have low income. Moreover, it notes that childcare costs are not tax deductible and, as the publicly funded Bar is more diverse than other areas, barristers from more diverse backgrounds are more disadvantaged by the current crisis.

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll