header-logo header-logo

02 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Bar Chair urges government to give immediate support to the Bar

The Bar Council surveyed heads of chambers at 262 sets, with 145 responses to date. The main concerns raised were interruption to court work, inability to generate income and lack of cash flow to pay current costs

More than half of chambers say they could not survive more than six months without financial aid, if current circumstances persisted, and 81% could not last a year.

However, less than a quarter of chambers intend to take up the government’s Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS)―heads of chambers were uncertain about whether they would qualify for the scheme as well as what the terms entailed and what level of debt would result.

The survey uncovered grim news for those poised to begin their careers. Some 30% of chambers are changing their plans for pupillage starting in 2020 or 2021, and will or may not be taking pupils as planned. A further 24% are currently unsure, and continue to review the position.

Criminal law is the most affected area―two thirds of chambers said they could not survive six months and 90% could not last a year. 60% of criminal chambers are furloughing clerks and other staff, more than half are taking urgent measures such as renegotiating their lease, and 36% are changing their plans for pupillage, while a further 22% are unsure.

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘We continue to urge the Ministry of Justice and government to give immediate support to the Bar, especially those in the early stages of their practice and those doing publicly funded work.

‘Whilst the measures introduced last week by the Chancellor of the Exchequer to help the self-employed were welcome, the self-employed Bar and chambers have needs that have not been addressed. Having canvassed the Bar through our survey, we have identified consistent concerns that chambers are facing, which we have raised as a matter of urgency with the government. We continue to press for action on these issues.’

In particular, the Bar Council points out that pupils and the most junior tenants are not eligible for hardship relief as first six pupils are not categorised as either employed or self-employed, and new tenants do not have a 2018/19 tax return. It expresses concern that parents returning from parental or adoption leave may lack a tax return for last year or have low income. Moreover, it notes that childcare costs are not tax deductible and, as the publicly funded Bar is more diverse than other areas, barristers from more diverse backgrounds are more disadvantaged by the current crisis.

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll