header-logo header-logo

24 June 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Re-setting the PACE?

23167
Police interviews during the COVID-19 crisis: Michael Zander on the new rules
  • Consultation: new PACE rules to authorise remote interviewing of suspects during the coronavirus emergency.

The Home Office is consulting urgently on new PACE rules to authorise remote interviewing of suspects during the coronavirus emergency. The new rules are to support the emergency Interview Protocol (https://bit.ly/2CrvZpG) agreed between the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Crown Prosecution Service, Law Society, Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association and London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association. The consultation ends on 3 July.

The changes to PACE Code C (to last only during the crisis) are set out in a new Annex AA. They modify the existing provisions which allow a suspect to have their solicitor present during the interview. The changes allow for legal advice during interview to be provided by a live link or a telephone conference link, provided that, in the case of a telephone call, it is visually recorded.

The custody officer in the case of someone detained, or the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll