header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 June 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Re-setting the PACE?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
23167
Police interviews during the COVID-19 crisis: Michael Zander on the new rules
  • Consultation: new PACE rules to authorise remote interviewing of suspects during the coronavirus emergency.

The Home Office is consulting urgently on new PACE rules to authorise remote interviewing of suspects during the coronavirus emergency. The new rules are to support the emergency Interview Protocol (https://bit.ly/2CrvZpG) agreed between the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Crown Prosecution Service, Law Society, Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association and London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association. The consultation ends on 3 July.

The changes to PACE Code C (to last only during the crisis) are set out in a new Annex AA. They modify the existing provisions which allow a suspect to have their solicitor present during the interview. The changes allow for legal advice during interview to be provided by a live link or a telephone conference link, provided that, in the case of a telephone call, it is visually recorded.

The custody officer in the case of someone detained, or the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll