header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 June 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Re-setting the PACE?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
23167
Police interviews during the COVID-19 crisis: Michael Zander on the new rules
  • Consultation: new PACE rules to authorise remote interviewing of suspects during the coronavirus emergency.

The Home Office is consulting urgently on new PACE rules to authorise remote interviewing of suspects during the coronavirus emergency. The new rules are to support the emergency Interview Protocol (https://bit.ly/2CrvZpG) agreed between the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Crown Prosecution Service, Law Society, Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association and London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association. The consultation ends on 3 July.

The changes to PACE Code C (to last only during the crisis) are set out in a new Annex AA. They modify the existing provisions which allow a suspect to have their solicitor present during the interview. The changes allow for legal advice during interview to be provided by a live link or a telephone conference link, provided that, in the case of a telephone call, it is visually recorded.

The custody officer in the case of someone detained, or the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll