header-logo header-logo

30 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Small law firms under threat

High street law firms are at immediate risk of collapse due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Law Society research has found
A survey sent to nearly 8,000 small firms (four or fewer partners, including sole practitioners) returned a devastating result. Of the 774 firms who replied, 71% said they may have to close their business in the next six months as a result of the crisis. The respondents reported cashflow pressures and reduced fee income.

Law Society president Simon Davis (pictured) said: ‘There are widespread concerns over liquidity as firms face a dramatic plunge in income with work falling away.

‘Residential property transactions have ground to a halt. Reduction in court hearings has massively impacted on the amount of work available―while social distancing and the lack of face-to-face meetings is causing difficulty delivering in other areas, such as the execution of wills.

‘Elsewhere, small firms have suffered from the decline in overall activity―particularly from service industries such as retail, leisure and hospitality. The fate of the high-street firm is thus intrinsically bound to that of other small businesses.’

Davis said that, while the government support will provide some relief, many businesses will fall through the cracks. Firms are expected to continue to pay business rates even though their office may be standing empty, for example, and solicitors who have earned more than £50,000 profit in the preceding year is excluded from the rescue package for the self-employed.

‘Crucially, there must be also be support package in place for those legal practitioners who are paid via dividends,’ Davis said.

‘Under the current schemes such people will only be able to receive a minimal amount of support, possibly no more than £575 per month. This could be solved by extending support to sole practitioners operating via a professional service company.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll