header-logo header-logo

13 April 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Public
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: The Coronavirus Regulations

Neil Parpworth considers the nature & implementation of the powers the police have been given to restrict movement & gatherings
  • Although brief in nature, the regulations are significant in terms of their likely impact upon certain rights and freedoms of the individual.
  • During the emergency period’ they enable various restrictions or requirements to be imposed on individuals relating to the carrying on of a business, their freedom of movement, and their ability to gather in a public place.

Although brief in nature, the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/350) are significant in terms of their likely impact upon certain rights and freedoms of the individual. During the ‘emergency period’, they enable various restrictions or requirements to be imposed on individuals relating to the carrying on of a business (regs 4 and 5), their freedom of movement (reg 6), and their ability to gather in a public place (reg 7). For the purposes of the present discussion, attention will focus on the latter two restrictions.

Restrictions on movement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll