header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

COVID claims: business as (un)usual

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
31 March 2021 / Celso De Azevedo
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
44714
What now for COVID-19 business interruption claims? Celso De Azevedo discusses the Supreme Court’s judgment & the issues likely to drive future litigation
  • Disputed issues in the draft Declarations Order.
  • Undecided issues and FCA guidance.

On 15 January 2021, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment on the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Test Case (The Financial Conduct Authority & Ors v Arch Insurance UK Ltd & Ors [2021] UKSC 1, [2021] All ER (D) 40 (Jan)) dealing with non-damage clauses which extended the typical coverage under business interruption insurance. According to the FCA, the Test Case will affect approximately 370,000 policyholders. In February, the Association of British Insurers estimated at £2bn the value of business interruption claims incurred in 2020 due to COVID-19.

The case included 21 representative policy ‘types’ issued by the eight insurers which became the defendants in the proceedings before the High Court. There were three types of policy wordings covering losses which were caused by:

  • an outbreak of disease within a specified
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Sports, education and charities practice welcomes senior associate

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Partner and head of commercial litigation joins in Chelmsford

Freeths—Louise Mahon

Freeths—Louise Mahon

Firm strengthens Glasgow corporate practice with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
Stress at work for corporate counsel
One in five in-house lawyers suffer ‘high’ or ‘severe’ work-related stress, according to a report by global legal body, the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)
Chancery Lane says no to LeO
The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers
Human rights concerns for patients, prisoners & immigration detainees
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Licensing fast-track for conveyancing & probate professionals
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Stress at work? Join the (employment tribunal claim) queue
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll