header-logo header-logo

02 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

CPS suggests setting up specialist economic crime court

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched an economic crime strategy, including the first economic crime court

The CPS said it has prosecuted 10,000 economic crime cases in the past financial year and warned the scale of fraud is growing, with £479m lost in bank transfer scams in 2020. It said 96% of fraud is cyber enabled.

The CPS strategy includes supporting the creation of the first economic crime court and the use of more Nightingale courts for fraud cases, recovering the proceeds of crime and seeking compensation for victims where possible, and supporting more virtual hearings for economic crime cases to help reduce the backlog.

Max Hill, director of public prosecutions, said: ‘This is a serious and growing area of criminality, which is why we have developed a focused plan to help combat it, providing more resources for specialist economic crime prosecutors, working closer with the police to build strong cases from the outset and giving victims confidence to come forward.’

However, David Corker, partner at Corker Binning, said: ‘Such a specialist court would rupture the system for the trial of all serious criminal cases which has existed since the Crown Court was invented in the early 1970s.

‘Crown Courts have since then been the sole judicial tribunal for the trial of all prosecutions brought on an indictment.’

Corker said similar proposals had been made before but had foundered mainly because of opposition from the judiciary who argued crimes should be treated the same. He said ‘two-tier justice would make it appear that there are ordinary criminals and economic crime ones which is not only wrong but also socially divisive.

He said: ‘It is a pity that the CPS did not boldly propose amending the requirement that all trials on indictment must be determined by a jury.

‘That it shied away from permitting an accused to choose whether to be tried by judge-alone or a jury as in the situation for example in Canada, New Zealand and most of Australia.’

Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll