header-logo header-logo

CPS suggests setting up specialist economic crime court

02 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched an economic crime strategy, including the first economic crime court

The CPS said it has prosecuted 10,000 economic crime cases in the past financial year and warned the scale of fraud is growing, with £479m lost in bank transfer scams in 2020. It said 96% of fraud is cyber enabled.

The CPS strategy includes supporting the creation of the first economic crime court and the use of more Nightingale courts for fraud cases, recovering the proceeds of crime and seeking compensation for victims where possible, and supporting more virtual hearings for economic crime cases to help reduce the backlog.

Max Hill, director of public prosecutions, said: ‘This is a serious and growing area of criminality, which is why we have developed a focused plan to help combat it, providing more resources for specialist economic crime prosecutors, working closer with the police to build strong cases from the outset and giving victims confidence to come forward.’

However, David Corker, partner at Corker Binning, said: ‘Such a specialist court would rupture the system for the trial of all serious criminal cases which has existed since the Crown Court was invented in the early 1970s.

‘Crown Courts have since then been the sole judicial tribunal for the trial of all prosecutions brought on an indictment.’

Corker said similar proposals had been made before but had foundered mainly because of opposition from the judiciary who argued crimes should be treated the same. He said ‘two-tier justice would make it appear that there are ordinary criminals and economic crime ones which is not only wrong but also socially divisive.

He said: ‘It is a pity that the CPS did not boldly propose amending the requirement that all trials on indictment must be determined by a jury.

‘That it shied away from permitting an accused to choose whether to be tried by judge-alone or a jury as in the situation for example in Canada, New Zealand and most of Australia.’

Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll