header-logo header-logo

05 August 2021
Issue: 7944 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crackdown on counterfeit goods

Counterfeiters who run a sophisticated operation or risk significant harm will receive tougher sentences up to a maximum of ten years or an unlimited fine, under Sentencing Council guidelines

Risk of significant harm would include risk of serious physical harm or death to end users. The guidelines, launched this week and scheduled to apply from 1 October, apply to the offence of using a trade mark without consent. They will replace the current guideline published in 2008, which only applies to individuals and is used only in magistrates’ courts.

The proposed new guidelines assess harm based on monetary value, with seriousness increased by any significant harm suffered by the trade mark owner or risk incurred by the purchaser or end user. They will apply to organisations as well as individuals for the first time and to Crown Court cases.

The starting point for an organisation running a £2m counterfeit operation would be a fine in the range of £150,000 to £450,000. For an individual, it would be three to seven years in custody.

Sentencing Council member, District Judge Mike Fanning said the guidelines ‘will enable courts to impose sentences that are consistent and proportionate in these cases which can be complicated and, by reason of the relative infrequency with which they come before the courts, unfamiliar to many sentencers’.

Counterfeit goods can include car parts and electrical equipment as well as toys and clothes, and are unlikely to have completed the relevant safety tests.

Prosecutions are relatively rare. In 2019, about 370 individuals were sentenced. More than a third received a community sentence, 31% received a fine, 17% received a suspended sentence, five per cent were discharged, six per cent received an alternative disposal such as confiscation or one day in police cells, and four per cent went to prison for an average of one year. The longest sentence was 36 months.

Issue: 7944 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll