header-logo header-logo

Criminal bar considers offer in stand off with government

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Criminal barristers have suspended their ‘no returns’ policy until 12 June, pending consideration of a conciliatory offer made by the Ministry of Justice.

The Criminal Bar has been refusing ‘returns’ work—where one advocate covers for another who has been delayed or called away—since 1 April in protest against changes to the Advocates Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) which would cut fee income.

A heads of chambers meeting was scheduled for this week to discuss the offer. In her weekly update, Angela Rafferty QC, Criminal Bar Chair, said barristers will be balloted following the meeting.

The offer on the table is an extra £15m investment, of which £8m will go to fraud, drug and high-page sex cases, £4.5m will be earmarked for junior fees, and there will be a 1% rise across all fees in April 2019. The scheme will be reviewed within 18 months.

Meanwhile, the Law Society is bringing a judicial review against cuts to the Litigators' Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS), which would reduce payments for prosecution evidence in Crown Court cases from 10,000 to 6,000 pages.

Law Society president Joe Egan said: ‘We’re pleased the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has recognised the argument that there needs to be proper funding in the criminal justice system, as evidenced by the proposed release of additional funds for legally aided work.

'We hope the MoJ will now withdraw their opposition to the Law Society’s judicial review for the LGFS cuts. We look forward to a similar announcement in relation to the work carried out by solicitors, including the withdrawal of the most recent pages of prosecution evidence cut.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll