header-logo header-logo

Criminal bar considers offer in stand off with government

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Criminal barristers have suspended their ‘no returns’ policy until 12 June, pending consideration of a conciliatory offer made by the Ministry of Justice.

The Criminal Bar has been refusing ‘returns’ work—where one advocate covers for another who has been delayed or called away—since 1 April in protest against changes to the Advocates Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) which would cut fee income.

A heads of chambers meeting was scheduled for this week to discuss the offer. In her weekly update, Angela Rafferty QC, Criminal Bar Chair, said barristers will be balloted following the meeting.

The offer on the table is an extra £15m investment, of which £8m will go to fraud, drug and high-page sex cases, £4.5m will be earmarked for junior fees, and there will be a 1% rise across all fees in April 2019. The scheme will be reviewed within 18 months.

Meanwhile, the Law Society is bringing a judicial review against cuts to the Litigators' Graduated Fee Scheme (LGFS), which would reduce payments for prosecution evidence in Crown Court cases from 10,000 to 6,000 pages.

Law Society president Joe Egan said: ‘We’re pleased the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has recognised the argument that there needs to be proper funding in the criminal justice system, as evidenced by the proposed release of additional funds for legally aided work.

'We hope the MoJ will now withdraw their opposition to the Law Society’s judicial review for the LGFS cuts. We look forward to a similar announcement in relation to the work carried out by solicitors, including the withdrawal of the most recent pages of prosecution evidence cut.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll