header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers take action

Criminal legal aid solicitors across England and Wales were divided on whether to take direct action this week over new contract terms.

Solicitors at meetings in London, Merseyside and Manchester voted unanimously in favour of direct action, agreeing not to accept legal aid work under the new contracts, which were due to begin on 1 July. Solicitors at meetings in Cardiff, Birmingham and East Yorkshire have also backed the action.

The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) meeting described the levels of funding about to be introduced as “untenable” and the new two-tier contract scheme “ill-conceived” as it risked “irreparable and unconscionable damage to the criminal justice system”.

However, solicitors in both Leicester and Teeside voted against direct action.

The new contracts impose a further 8.75% cut on solicitors’ fees for criminal legal aid work. Solicitors say it will be uneconomical for them to do the work to the required standard as they would be running at a loss.

LCCSA President Jon Black says: “We have overwhelming support for this action, which regrettably is necessary as a result of the government’s intention to implement cuts and the proposed further cuts amounting to over 50% on some cases for January 2016, without carrying out the promised meaningful review.

“We have drafted a protocol, and firms that seek to act in breach of this are letting themselves, their professional colleagues and their clients down.”

Independent barristers attending the London meeting expressed support and proposed re-introducing a no returns policy for all existing cases in the Crown Court from 1 July. Manchester’s Garden Court North has also announced its support and is adopting a policy of no returns from 1 July.

-

 
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll