header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers take action

Criminal legal aid solicitors across England and Wales were divided on whether to take direct action this week over new contract terms.

Solicitors at meetings in London, Merseyside and Manchester voted unanimously in favour of direct action, agreeing not to accept legal aid work under the new contracts, which were due to begin on 1 July. Solicitors at meetings in Cardiff, Birmingham and East Yorkshire have also backed the action.

The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) meeting described the levels of funding about to be introduced as “untenable” and the new two-tier contract scheme “ill-conceived” as it risked “irreparable and unconscionable damage to the criminal justice system”.

However, solicitors in both Leicester and Teeside voted against direct action.

The new contracts impose a further 8.75% cut on solicitors’ fees for criminal legal aid work. Solicitors say it will be uneconomical for them to do the work to the required standard as they would be running at a loss.

LCCSA President Jon Black says: “We have overwhelming support for this action, which regrettably is necessary as a result of the government’s intention to implement cuts and the proposed further cuts amounting to over 50% on some cases for January 2016, without carrying out the promised meaningful review.

“We have drafted a protocol, and firms that seek to act in breach of this are letting themselves, their professional colleagues and their clients down.”

Independent barristers attending the London meeting expressed support and proposed re-introducing a no returns policy for all existing cases in the Crown Court from 1 July. Manchester’s Garden Court North has also announced its support and is adopting a policy of no returns from 1 July.

-

 
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll