header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

R (Gillan) v DPP [2007] EWHC 380, [2007] All ER (D) 185 (Feb)

(a) applications for judicial review of interlocutory rulings by crown court judges where the decision is not one involving trial on indictment should be relatively rare and exceptional;

(b) a crown court judge has jurisdiction to allow a fresh Newton hearing to take place (even though one took place in the magistrates’ court before the defendant was committed for sentence) if satisfied that it is in the interests of fairness and justice to do so. 

However, the judge should not ordinarily allow a defendant to re-open findings of fact determined by a magistrates’ court unless the defendant can point to some significant development or matter, such as important further evidence discovered since the magistrates’ court reached its conclusion on the facts.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll