header-logo header-logo

27 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crown Court unlimited

The cap on the number of days the Crown Court can sit during a financial year has been lifted for a second year, in order to tackle the backlog of cases

Last year, the Crown Court sat for an extra 17,000 cases (about 98,500 days compared to 82,000 in 2019/20). The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is also keeping 30 Nightingale courtrooms open until March 2023.

The Crown Court backlog stands at about 60,000, and the MoJ aims to reduce the backlog to 53,000 by March 2025.

In a report published this week, Court Capacity, however, the House of Commons Justice Committee said the government needs to set out how many trials must take place each month and set out a ‘detailed roadmap of how the necessary increase in capacity will be secured’, if it is to achieve this target.

The committee said the MoJ’s decision to reduce the number of Crown Court sitting days in 2019 was ‘a mistake and should serve as a lesson’ for future decision making.

Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll