header-logo header-logo

27 April 2022
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crown Court unlimited

The cap on the number of days the Crown Court can sit during a financial year has been lifted for a second year, in order to tackle the backlog of cases

Last year, the Crown Court sat for an extra 17,000 cases (about 98,500 days compared to 82,000 in 2019/20). The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is also keeping 30 Nightingale courtrooms open until March 2023.

The Crown Court backlog stands at about 60,000, and the MoJ aims to reduce the backlog to 53,000 by March 2025.

In a report published this week, Court Capacity, however, the House of Commons Justice Committee said the government needs to set out how many trials must take place each month and set out a ‘detailed roadmap of how the necessary increase in capacity will be secured’, if it is to achieve this target.

The committee said the MoJ’s decision to reduce the number of Crown Court sitting days in 2019 was ‘a mistake and should serve as a lesson’ for future decision making.

Issue: 7976 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll