header-logo header-logo

24 May 2024 / William Gibson
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Features , International , Military , Governance
printer mail-detail

Cuban missile crisis: five days to save the world

174008
Secretive talks, tense negotiations & an ultimatum narrowly averted tragedy, writes William Gibson

On 21 October 1962, US President JF Kennedy sent an urgent message to UK Prime Minister Harold Macmillan to say the US had photographic evidence that Russia had installed surface-to-air missiles in Cuba and, even worse, that Soviet ships carrying more missiles were heading for the Communist island.

America had been very wary of possible threats from Cuba since the coup which had seized power for Fidel Castro, always assumed to have been achieved with Soviet backing.

According to Kennedy, he had only two options available to him: he could order an all-out air strike to take out the existing missile sites and then blockade Cuba; or he could impose an immediate no-entry zone around the island but with no air strike. Fortunately, the second option, favoured by Macmillan, was chosen and a 500-mile exclusion zone was established, patrolled by the US navy and air force.

As the Russian ships neared Cuba

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll