header-logo header-logo

24 May 2024 / William Gibson
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Features , International , Military , Governance
printer mail-detail

Cuban missile crisis: five days to save the world

174008
Secretive talks, tense negotiations & an ultimatum narrowly averted tragedy, writes William Gibson

On 21 October 1962, US President JF Kennedy sent an urgent message to UK Prime Minister Harold Macmillan to say the US had photographic evidence that Russia had installed surface-to-air missiles in Cuba and, even worse, that Soviet ships carrying more missiles were heading for the Communist island.

America had been very wary of possible threats from Cuba since the coup which had seized power for Fidel Castro, always assumed to have been achieved with Soviet backing.

According to Kennedy, he had only two options available to him: he could order an all-out air strike to take out the existing missile sites and then blockade Cuba; or he could impose an immediate no-entry zone around the island but with no air strike. Fortunately, the second option, favoured by Macmillan, was chosen and a 500-mile exclusion zone was established, patrolled by the US navy and air force.

As the Russian ships neared Cuba

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll