header-logo header-logo

Cuts cause capital offence

09 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

High Court rules London Councils not meeting equality duties

Plans to cut vital grants for more than 400 voluntary sector groups that help London’s poorest and weakest are unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Mr Justice Calvert-Smith ruled that London Councils failed to meet its statutory equality duties when it decided to cut its London Boroughs Grant Scheme by £10m. All the decisions were quashed including decisions to stop funding 213 projects run by 177 different organisations.

Calvert-Smith J ordered London Councils to “undertake a lawful process of reconsideration in accordance with the public sector equality duties”, and that no funding was to be terminated until “three months after the conclusion of the lawful consideration process”.

London Councils must therefore re-run its consultation process, this time with full equality impact assessments.

The case, R (Hajrula and Hamza) v London Councils [2011] EWHC 151, is the first to look at local authority equality duties since the coalition government introduced its cuts package.

London Voluntary Service Council’s chief executive Peter Lewis says the case sets an excellent precedent:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll