header-logo header-logo

Damage limitation

22 February 2013 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Michael Salter & Chris Bryden report on the dangers that employee social media use can pose for companies

Social media is now a widespread phenomenon, and given that most employers now operate at least in part online, it is essential that IT policies are brought up to date. Many such policies will date from the days when the focus was on use of e-mail and browsing the internet. However, with the untrammelled growth of media such as Facebook and Twitter, and the permanence that is now engendered by mirror sites and retweets, damage can swiftly be done to a company’s reputation with only limited powers to rectify.

Inside work

Many workplaces have a policy allowing limited use of the internet for personal purposes during working hours. However, many companies will have blurred the distinction between personal and business usage by having a presence on social media. Thus, an employee may monitor and run a Facebook or Twitter page that is set up to promote the business. The advent of Smartphones also means that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll