header-logo header-logo

22 February 2013 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Damage limitation

Michael Salter & Chris Bryden report on the dangers that employee social media use can pose for companies

Social media is now a widespread phenomenon, and given that most employers now operate at least in part online, it is essential that IT policies are brought up to date. Many such policies will date from the days when the focus was on use of e-mail and browsing the internet. However, with the untrammelled growth of media such as Facebook and Twitter, and the permanence that is now engendered by mirror sites and retweets, damage can swiftly be done to a company’s reputation with only limited powers to rectify.

Inside work

Many workplaces have a policy allowing limited use of the internet for personal purposes during working hours. However, many companies will have blurred the distinction between personal and business usage by having a presence on social media. Thus, an employee may monitor and run a Facebook or Twitter page that is set up to promote the business. The advent of Smartphones also means that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll