header-logo header-logo

31 January 2014
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Damages—Assessment of damages—Fatal accidents

Haxton v Philips Electronics UK Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 4, [2014] All ER (D) 138 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Elias, Beatson LJJ and Dame Janet Smith, 22 Jan 2014

There is no reason of principle or policy which should deprive a claimant from recovering damages representing the loss she has suffered as a result of the curtailment of her life by the negligent action of the defendant, where she has brought other proceedings against the defendant and the damages in those proceedings were lower because of her life expectancy being reduced by the defendant’s negligence.

Robert Weir QC and Harry Steinberg (instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP) for the claimant. Catherine Foster (instructed by Wragge & Co LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant and her husband both developed mesothelioma as a result of the husband’s exposure to asbestos dust during the course of his employment with the defendant company. The husband developed symptoms in 2008 and died the following year. The claimant issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll