header-logo header-logo

Cognitive assessments: dangerously remote?

15 March 2024 / Dr Tanya Garrett
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Career focus
printer mail-detail
163732
Psychologist Dr Tanya Garrett explains the risks of exclusively remote cognitive functioning & capacity assessments
  • Warns of the risks of remotely performed cognitive functioning, capacity and other psychological assessments.
  • Advises that solicitors should not commission these on a remote basis, and should alert the court in the event of any assessment being carried out remotely.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, I continued to offer all assessments in person, using personal protective equipment and social distancing. I felt this was important because so much of a psychologist’s assessment is based on rapport-building to ensure accurate information is provided and to assist clients when sharing difficult and personal information, as well as observing non-verbal communication, all of which are difficult to do remotely. However, I know many psychologists started offering remote assessments, including cognitive functioning/capacity assessments, and that this is still going on. I would suggest this was never necessary and that doing it now is not only unnecessary, but likely inappropriate unless under certain circumstances, as well as potentially misleading.

I first became concerned when I saw cognitive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll