header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Charities , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Data obligations

nlj_7739_walsh

Charities must ensure that data is handled correctly, says Bethan Walsh

  • Charities must recognise the serious repercussions of mishandling customer data.

Following the recent fines issued to British Heart Foundation (BHF) and the RSPCA (£25,000 and £18,000 respectively) at the end of 2016, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has now notified a further 11 charities that it intends to fine them for breaching the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). The charities were investigated by the ICO as part of a wider operation following media reports about significant pressure placed on supporters to contribute to charities.

BHF and RSPCA fell foul of the DPA 1998 in relation to:

  • data sharing through a donor data swapping scheme called Reciprocate;
  • wealth screening; and
  • data-matching (telephone matching).

These practices were found to be in breach of the first principle of DPA 1998, which states that any personal data must be processed fairly and lawfully. The ICO’s decision was mainly based on the fact that BHF and the RSPCA had not sufficiently informed their supporters that their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll