header-logo header-logo

Data protection adequacy rating welcomed

01 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have welcomed the European Commission’s decision that UK data protection standards are ‘adequate’―however, weakening standards could lead to immediate revocation
The decision means digital information can continue to flow between the UK and European Economic Area (EEA) without additional safeguards being introduced.

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the European Commission determines whether third countries provide adequate protection for personal data. The Trade and Cooperation Agreement provided a bridging mechanism, which was due to end on 30 June 2021.

Kate Brimsted, partner at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, said: ‘This formal recognition of the adequacy of the UK’s data protection laws is a highly significant step. 

‘It will save EU businesses with UK-bound data flows―as well as their UK business partners―a considerable amount of red tape. The decision was not a forgone conclusion and objections and concerns were raised by the European Parliament during the process.’

However, she highlighted the fact the decision came with a built-in expiry date of four years.

‘As well as this, if the UK’s data policy innovations go too far for the European Commission’s liking, there is the ability to revoke the decision immediately,’ she said.

‘While this comes as a relief (if not a surprise), the UK will have to box clever when it comes to its post-Brexit liberalisation of laws, and its digital strategy-setting. The UK government’s TIGRR [Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform] report last month proposed replacing the GDPR with a “more proportionate framework”, something which sounds exactly the kind of move likely to endanger the UK’s adequacy decision, if taken up.’

Had the European Commission decision gone the other way, all those processing personal data would have been required to put in place appropriate safeguards or rely on exemptions in data protection law.

The Law Society, which has been urging members to hope for the best but prepare for the worst, welcomed the news but recommended members regularly review their contingency planning.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Though adopted, adequacy decisions are time-limited, subject to review and may even be challenged in the future especially if the UK diverges from EU regulation.’

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll