header-logo header-logo

The day of reckoning?

istock_000008611999_calender

Dominic Regan provides the fundamental guide to the new portals

Poor claimant injury lawyers. Yet more upheaval, over and above the Jackson reforms, is imminent. The innocuously titled Civil Procedure (Amendment No 6) Rules 2013 (SI 2013/1695) do not betray the horrors which lurk within. Not only do we see portal extension but also a fixed costs regime which will attach to cases that exit the portal, are litigated and even reach trial. The days of costs far exceeding damages are numbered.

Changes to RTA portal

The road traffic accident (RTA) portal is well established. Where the claim notification form (CNF) is sent on or after 31 July 2013 the ceiling rises dramatically, more than doubling from the present £10,000 to £25,000. It would be prudent to fire off a CNF at once for cases worth over £10,000. The fixed costs for cases falling within the new, higher band will be £200 at stage 1 and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll