header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Daylight in asbestos fight

Victory at last for asbestos sufferers in landmark battle for justice

A victory in the High Court for victims of asbestos related disease has removed the contradictions in the arguments of insurance firms and provided fairness for the claimants, say lawyers.

The case stemmed from the refusal of insurers to pay out in mesothelioma claims after the ruling in Bolton MBC v Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd [2006] All ER (D) 66 (Feb), where it was held that in public liability insurance, the policy was triggered by the development of the disease—an argument insurers claimed should also be applied to employers’ liability claims.

However, in the “Employers’ Liability Policy ‘Trigger’ Litigation”, Mr Justice Burton found that the injury was sustained when it was caused and so the policies should be construed as such.

Peter Taylor, partner in the insurance and reinsurance practice at Lovells, says the ruling is a landmark in the long battle between the UK claimants and their employers’ insurance companies.

“Burton J found that exposure or the ‘date of inhalation’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
back-to-top-scroll