header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Daylight in asbestos fight

Victory at last for asbestos sufferers in landmark battle for justice

A victory in the High Court for victims of asbestos related disease has removed the contradictions in the arguments of insurance firms and provided fairness for the claimants, say lawyers.

The case stemmed from the refusal of insurers to pay out in mesothelioma claims after the ruling in Bolton MBC v Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd [2006] All ER (D) 66 (Feb), where it was held that in public liability insurance, the policy was triggered by the development of the disease—an argument insurers claimed should also be applied to employers’ liability claims.

However, in the “Employers’ Liability Policy ‘Trigger’ Litigation”, Mr Justice Burton found that the injury was sustained when it was caused and so the policies should be construed as such.

Peter Taylor, partner in the insurance and reinsurance practice at Lovells, says the ruling is a landmark in the long battle between the UK claimants and their employers’ insurance companies.

“Burton J found that exposure or the ‘date of inhalation’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll