header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Daylight in asbestos fight

Victory at last for asbestos sufferers in landmark battle for justice

A victory in the High Court for victims of asbestos related disease has removed the contradictions in the arguments of insurance firms and provided fairness for the claimants, say lawyers.

The case stemmed from the refusal of insurers to pay out in mesothelioma claims after the ruling in Bolton MBC v Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd [2006] All ER (D) 66 (Feb), where it was held that in public liability insurance, the policy was triggered by the development of the disease—an argument insurers claimed should also be applied to employers’ liability claims.

However, in the “Employers’ Liability Policy ‘Trigger’ Litigation”, Mr Justice Burton found that the injury was sustained when it was caused and so the policies should be construed as such.

Peter Taylor, partner in the insurance and reinsurance practice at Lovells, says the ruling is a landmark in the long battle between the UK claimants and their employers’ insurance companies.

“Burton J found that exposure or the ‘date of inhalation’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll