header-logo header-logo

Decision time

05 May 2017 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter welcome the introduction of a searchable database of tribunal judgments

  • Launch of online tribunal decision database is a welcome modernising step.
  • However, there are some potential difficulties.

Unlike the County and Family Courts at first instance, which have for some time had neutral citation references (EWCC and EWFC respectively) and as a result have had an increasing number of judgments archived on BAILII to provide assistance to practitioners, first instance decisions of Employment Tribunals have been much harder to come by. However, recently the Ministry of Justice launched a website which contains Employment Tribunal judgments. Until its launch the only way to obtain a tribunal judgment was to contact Bury St. Edmunds or Glasgow, pay a fee and obtain the judgment. As a result of this initiative, tribunal decisions (which, unlike County or Family Courts, are often typed up in any event, thus forming a valuable resource) are now available instantly, easily, and without charge.

Pros

Of course, the legal impact of tribunal judgments is limited; as the decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll