header-logo header-logo

Decision time

05 May 2017 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter welcome the introduction of a searchable database of tribunal judgments

  • Launch of online tribunal decision database is a welcome modernising step.
  • However, there are some potential difficulties.

Unlike the County and Family Courts at first instance, which have for some time had neutral citation references (EWCC and EWFC respectively) and as a result have had an increasing number of judgments archived on BAILII to provide assistance to practitioners, first instance decisions of Employment Tribunals have been much harder to come by. However, recently the Ministry of Justice launched a website which contains Employment Tribunal judgments. Until its launch the only way to obtain a tribunal judgment was to contact Bury St. Edmunds or Glasgow, pay a fee and obtain the judgment. As a result of this initiative, tribunal decisions (which, unlike County or Family Courts, are often typed up in any event, thus forming a valuable resource) are now available instantly, easily, and without charge.

Pros

Of course, the legal impact of tribunal judgments is limited; as the decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll