header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 August 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Decoding the code

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Charles Pigott studies the application of ACAS Code of Practice to non-disciplinary dismissals
  • Two recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have confirmed that, strictly speaking, the ACAS Code of Practice does not apply to dismissals unless there is a disciplinary element.
  • However the Code’s key principles may be relevant to determining fairness in other kinds of dismissals.

The code with which we are concerned is the most familiar of the statutory codes of practice issued by the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS). The Code of Practice on discipline and grievance procedures (the Code) was first published in 1977 and was most recently re-issued in 2015.

Originally s 207 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992) simply gave employment tribunals discretion to take into account any provision of a statutory code of practice that appeared to be “relevant to any question arising in the proceedings” before it.

However s 207A of TULR(C)A 1992, introduced in 2009 to fill the vacuum left by the repeal of the statutory dispute resolution procedures,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll