header-logo header-logo

Decoding the code

17 August 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Charles Pigott studies the application of ACAS Code of Practice to non-disciplinary dismissals

  • Two recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have confirmed that, strictly speaking, the ACAS Code of Practice does not apply to dismissals unless there is a disciplinary element.
  • However the Code’s key principles may be relevant to determining fairness in other kinds of dismissals.

The code with which we are concerned is the most familiar of the statutory codes of practice issued by the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS). The Code of Practice on discipline and grievance procedures (the Code) was first published in 1977 and was most recently re-issued in 2015.

Originally s 207 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992) simply gave employment tribunals discretion to take into account any provision of a statutory code of practice that appeared to be “relevant to any question arising in the proceedings” before it.

However s 207A of TULR(C)A 1992, introduced in 2009 to fill the vacuum left by the repeal of the statutory dispute resolution procedures,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll