header-logo header-logo

Decoding the code

17 August 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Charles Pigott studies the application of ACAS Code of Practice to non-disciplinary dismissals

  • Two recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have confirmed that, strictly speaking, the ACAS Code of Practice does not apply to dismissals unless there is a disciplinary element.
  • However the Code’s key principles may be relevant to determining fairness in other kinds of dismissals.

The code with which we are concerned is the most familiar of the statutory codes of practice issued by the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS). The Code of Practice on discipline and grievance procedures (the Code) was first published in 1977 and was most recently re-issued in 2015.

Originally s 207 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992) simply gave employment tribunals discretion to take into account any provision of a statutory code of practice that appeared to be “relevant to any question arising in the proceedings” before it.

However s 207A of TULR(C)A 1992, introduced in 2009 to fill the vacuum left by the repeal of the statutory dispute resolution procedures,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll