Decoding the code

Charles Pigott studies the application of ACAS Code of Practice to non-disciplinary dismissals

Two recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have confirmed that, strictly speaking, the ACAS Code of Practice does not apply to dismissals unless there is a disciplinary element.
However the Code’s key principles may be relevant to determining fairness in other kinds of dismissals.

The code with which we are concerned is the most familiar of the statutory codes of practice issued by the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS). The Code of Practice on discipline and grievance procedures (the Code) was first published in 1977 and was most recently re-issued in 2015.

Originally s 207 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992) simply gave employment tribunals discretion to take into account any provision of a statutory code of practice that appeared to be “relevant to any question arising in the proceedings” before it.

However s 207A of TULR(C)A 1992, introduced in 2009 to fill the vacuum left by the repeal of the statutory dispute resolution procedures,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Decoding the code

Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Employment

Charles Pigott studies the application of ACAS Code of Practice to non-disciplinary dismissals

Two recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have confirmed that, strictly speaking, the ACAS Code of Practice does not apply to dismissals unless there is a disciplinary element.
However the Code’s key principles may be relevant to determining fairness in other kinds of dismissals.

However s 207A of TULR(C)A 1992, introduced in 2009 to fill the vacuum left by the repeal of the statutory dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Reframing family dispute resolution

As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes

NLJ this week: Employment law updates on restraints, representation & tribunal boundaries

A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike

NLJ this week Civil way: Practical procedure lessons & cautionary tales

From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

NLJ this week: Fraud in the digital age

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

NLJ this week: Right outcome, troubling reasoning?

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct?

Error message

Decoding the code

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay