header-logo header-logo

Deepfakes & data misuse

243958

Data protection law already provides the tools to tackle intimate image abuse: it is time for those in power to act, says Jon Belcher

  • AI-generated deepfakes of real people amount to personal data processing, bringing them squarely within the scope of UK data protection law.
  • The Information Commissioner’s Office already has the powers to act against platforms enabling non-consensual image abuse—the issue is enforcement, not a lack of legislation.

Recent controversy about deepfake images generated by artificial intelligence (AI) has created the perception of a lack of legal protections for individuals, and led to a wider debate about how we regulate the ever-growing AI industry.

In fact, there are relevant laws already in place, but these have not yet proved effective to protect individuals. The UK’s data protection legislation could be used to tackle the issue, if the regulator and the courts were prepared to take decisive action.

Grok & the deepfake factories

Since purchasing the social media platform Twitter in 2022, which he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll