header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026 / Natalie Quinlivan
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Features , Company , Limitation
printer mail-detail

Delay & discretion post-Zedra

249513
© Getty images
Natalie Quinlivan looks into limitation and unfair prejudice petitions after THG v Zedra and offers practical advice
  • Covers limitation and unfair prejudice petitions after the landmark case of THG Plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd.

THG Plc v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2026] UKSC 6 has brought welcome clarity to a question that had unsettled company lawyers and litigators alike: whether statutory limitation periods apply to unfair prejudice petitions under s 994 of the Companies Act 2006.

In overturning the Court of Appeal’s 2024 decision, the Supreme Court has restored what had long been understood to be the correct position, that no statutory limitation period applies to s 994 claims. The judgment is significant not simply because it reinstates 40 years of ‘received wisdom’, but because it provides a principled explanation of the juridical nature of unfair prejudice relief, and the proper role of limitation concepts in this area of company law.

This article examines the decision in THG, explains why the Supreme Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll