header-logo header-logo

Delays & drop in disposals at the family court

01 April 2022
Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession
printer mail-detail
Care and supervision cases are taking five weeks longer on average and 77% fail to meet the 26-week limit, according to the latest figures from the family court

Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures for the fourth quarter in 2021 show care and supervision cases took 47 weeks on average to reach first disposal, up five weeks from the same period in 2020 and the highest average since 2012.

Fewer than a quarter (23%) met the 26-week limit set by the Children and Families Act 2014.

Overall, 17% fewer new cases across all case types were started in the quarter compared to the same period in 2020. This breaks down to 25% fewer matrimonial, 18% fewer adoption, 12% fewer private, 7% fewer public law and five per cent fewer domestic violence cases (despite reported incidences of domestic violence rising 6% in the year to March 2021).

The ONS considered the drop in matrimonial cases might be due to couples waiting for the introduction of no-fault divorce in April 2022.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Delays can themselves cause significant harm as well as uncertainty for the parties involved.

‘It has previously been estimated by the HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) that it may take three years to return to pre-pandemic levels, which is a great cause for concern, particularly for cases that concern children and family matters. From the outset, we’ve said the UK government must maximise existing court capacity, boosting it through Nightingale courts to allow more in-person hearings to take place safely.

‘The UK government must ensure, so far as possible, that there are sufficient fee-paid and full-time judges to deal with existing and new caseloads.’

Boyce also highlighted the lack of any data on litigants in person (LiPs) in the latest statistics.

‘Members working in family law continue to report about the high number of LiPs in the court system,’ she said.

‘In most cases, LiPs are unable to afford representation and have no choice but to represent themselves. This impacts court time and resources and make the provision of representation under legal aid contracts a cost-effective solution to the backlogs.

‘It would also enable the most efficient use of court capacity across the country. Although this is not within the control of the courts, it is a key concern that should continue to be raised by the sector.’


Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll