header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007 / David Brock
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Opinion , Regulatory , Property
printer mail-detail

Democratic development?

David Brock questions the Barker report’s implications for government and economics

The Barker Review of Land Use Planning—Final Report—Recommendations (the Barker report), was published on 5 December 2006, the day before the Pre-Budget Report (PBR), Investing in Britain’s Potential: Building our Long-Term Future (Cm 6984). The Chancellor, Gordon Brown, commissioned the review in 2005, surprising many, coming just a year after the major changes to the planning system wrought by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (PCPA 2004)—changes born of criticism that planning was holding back economic growth.

The Chancellor’s wider agenda, probably most recently stated by him in the PBR, “drives forward the great economic mission of our time—to meet the global challenge, to unleash the potential of all British people, so that the British economy outperforms our competitors—and deliver[s] security, prosperity, and fairness for all.”

Despite press comment on green belts, the most important recommendations are on the plan-led system; the role of economics in planning; streamlining the new system; and the role of the secretary of state in planning decisions,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll