header-logo header-logo

Democratic development?

08 February 2007 / David Brock
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Opinion , Regulatory , Property
printer mail-detail

David Brock questions the Barker report’s implications for government and economics

The Barker Review of Land Use Planning—Final Report—Recommendations (the Barker report), was published on 5 December 2006, the day before the Pre-Budget Report (PBR), Investing in Britain’s Potential: Building our Long-Term Future (Cm 6984). The Chancellor, Gordon Brown, commissioned the review in 2005, surprising many, coming just a year after the major changes to the planning system wrought by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (PCPA 2004)—changes born of criticism that planning was holding back economic growth.

The Chancellor’s wider agenda, probably most recently stated by him in the PBR, “drives forward the great economic mission of our time—to meet the global challenge, to unleash the potential of all British people, so that the British economy outperforms our competitors—and deliver[s] security, prosperity, and fairness for all.”

Despite press comment on green belts, the most important recommendations are on the plan-led system; the role of economics in planning; streamlining the new system; and the role of the secretary of state in planning decisions,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll