header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Devolution plans for High Court justice

News

Regional centres of the Administrative Court should be established to allow High Court sittings to take place regularly outside London, a judicial working group has recommended.

The working group—led by Lord Justice May, vice-president of the Queen’s Bench Division—in its report, Justice Outside of London, calls for High Court judges to be allowed to sit at administrative centres in Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds and Cardiff, dealing with work currently only dealt with in London’s Royal Courts of Justice.

The report says: “The present system discriminates against those who are not in the South of England.” The recommendations have been met with overwhelming support from lawyers in the regions.

Sukhdev Bhomra, president of Birmingham Law Society, says: “We have campaigned for years for the establishment of an Administrative Court in Birmingham. We urge the government to implement the report’s recommendations as soon as possible and bring greater access to justice to the citizens of Birmingham and its environs.’’

Jeff Lewis, chair of Manchester Law Society’s civil litigation committee and a partner at Brabners Chaffe Street, says the move would boost the status of Manchester’s legal profession.“Lawyers who are used to spending large periods of time in London could remain locally. This would assist in the retention of good lawyers by north west firms and chambers: too often lawyers specialising in administrative law have found they have had to leave Manchester for London to ‘follow the work’.”

He adds: “If a party wants to apply, for example, for judicial review of a matter with a north west connection, even where both sides are based in the north west and the subject-matter is rooted there, all parties have to travel to London for a hearing. Quite apart from the impact that this has on costs, this is an outmoded and in many ways illogical system, and we welcome any attempts to change it.”

James Haddleton, chairman of Leeds Law Society’s civil litigation committee and a partner at DLA Piper, says regional access to justice makes sense.
“We have county courts in towns and cities across England and Wales precisely because justice should be dispensed where people live. There is no longer a case for keeping the Administrative Court only in London. We anticipate more than 700 immigration cases could be heard each year in Leeds if the Administrative Court set up here.”

Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll