header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Different strokes?

Can costs be ordered against a local authority, asks Jonathan Herring

The Supreme Court is not normally asked to consider costs orders in any detail, but in Re T (Children) [2012] UKSC 36 it did so because the question was an important one of principle. The central issue was whether a local authority could be required to pay the costs of a party to care proceedings.
Care proceedings had been brought by a council, following allegations from two children that they had been sexually abused by their father and six other men. It was alleged that the children’s grandparents had colluded with the abuse. The grandparents were joined as interveners as well as five of the men. A fact-finding hearing took place in 2009, lasting five and a half weeks. The hearing exonerated the grandparents and the five men.

The costs issue arose because the grandparents (a retired fisherman and part-time bookkeeper), who had a modest income of £25,000, were not entitled to legal aid. They borrowed £55,000 to fund their legal advice and representation. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll