header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 February 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Digital legal rights

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
15748
Can digital systems benefit suspects in the police station? Michael Zander considers some of the legal issues

Digital systems could help in the provision of legal advice for suspects in police stations according to Dr Vicky Kemp of the University of Nottingham, writing in February’s issue of Criminal Law Review. Dr Kemp has been involved in police station research for over two decades (see ‘Digital legal rights: exploring detainees’ understanding of the right to a lawyer and potential barriers to accessing legal advice’ [2020] Crim. L.R. 129-147).

Many of the issues and problems regarding access to legal advice are well known:

  • suspects with a poor understanding of why legal advice might be beneficial;
  • the police failing to comply with the PACE rules enabling legal advice;
  • difficulties for solicitors to get through to clients on the phone;
  • solicitors reluctant to come to the police station until the interview; and
  • the telephone used by suspects to speak to solicitors physically sited so that the conversation can be overheard
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll