header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 February 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Digital legal rights

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
15748
Can digital systems benefit suspects in the police station? Michael Zander considers some of the legal issues

Digital systems could help in the provision of legal advice for suspects in police stations according to Dr Vicky Kemp of the University of Nottingham, writing in February’s issue of Criminal Law Review. Dr Kemp has been involved in police station research for over two decades (see ‘Digital legal rights: exploring detainees’ understanding of the right to a lawyer and potential barriers to accessing legal advice’ [2020] Crim. L.R. 129-147).

Many of the issues and problems regarding access to legal advice are well known:

  • suspects with a poor understanding of why legal advice might be beneficial;
  • the police failing to comply with the PACE rules enabling legal advice;
  • difficulties for solicitors to get through to clients on the phone;
  • solicitors reluctant to come to the police station until the interview; and
  • the telephone used by suspects to speak to solicitors physically sited so that the conversation can be overheard
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When saying no to mediation pays
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
NLJ this week: 40 years on, has PACE lost its edge?
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
NLJ this week: Stress-testing the City
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll