30 April 2009 / Daren Allen , Nick Marsh

Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial

Dilemma resolved

Daren Allen & Nick Marsh consider a bank's conflicting obligations when it suspects money laundering

In the recent case of Shah v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd [2009] EWHC 79 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 204 (Jan) the court considered a bank's potentially conflicting exposure, when it suspects money laundering. On the one hand it may be liable to criminal prosecution if it proceeds with a transaction without consent, yet on the other it has a contractual obligation to its customers to comply with instructions.

Shah v HSBC can be summarised as follows:

● The claimants, who were resident in Zimbabwe, held an account with HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited.

● Between 20 September 2006 and 28 February 2007, the bank delayed execution of four separate payment instructions given by the claimants, including an instruction to transfer approximately US$28m.

● In each case the bank suspected that the funds in the claimants' account were criminal property. Before the bank proceeded with each transaction, it made an authorised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Dilemma resolved

Daren Allen & Nick Marsh consider a bank's conflicting obligations when it suspects money laundering

Shah v HSBC can be summarised as follows:

● The claimants, who were resident in Zimbabwe, held an account with HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited.

● Between 20 September 2006 and 28 February 2007, the bank delayed execution of four separate payment instructions given by the claimants, including an instruction to transfer approximately US$28m.

● In each case the bank suspected that the funds in the claimants' account were criminal property. Before the bank proceeded with each transaction, it made an authorised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’

Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot

NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake

The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’

NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’

A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes

NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?

After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent

NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?

Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25

Error message

Dilemma resolved

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

HFW—Simon Petch

Freeths—Richard Lockhart