header-logo header-logo

Disclosure or inspection of documents—Third parties—Open justice

03 May 2012
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2012] EWCA Civ 420, [2012] All ER (D) 18 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Neuberger MR, Hooper and Tomlinson LJJ, 3 Apr 2012

In a case where documents have been placed before a judge and referred to in the course of proceedings, the default position is that access will be permitted on the open justice principle; where access is sought for a proper journalistic purpose, the case for allowing it will be particularly strong.

Gavin Millar QC and Adam Wolanski (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the claimant. The defendant did not appear and was not represented. David Perry QC and Melanie Cumberland (instructed by the CPS) for the government of the US as interested party. Heather Rogers QC and Ben Silverstone (instructed by Leigh Day & Co) for the intervener.

The government of the US, the interested party in the instant proceedings, sought the extradition of two British

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll