header-logo header-logo

Discovery channel

17 May 2012 / Adam Craggs
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Adam Craggs analyses HMRC’s latest defeat in the First-tier Tribunal

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are able to raise what are colloquially called “discovery” assessments under s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970). This is a topical issue at the moment among tax practitioners and there have been a number of important cases in recent months. The latest taxpayer to successfully challenge the validity of a discovery assessment is Anthony While (While v HMRC [2012] UKFTT 58 (TC)).

Background

Before considering While’s case, it may be helpful to remind ourselves of the relevant statutory provisions. As readers will be aware, under s 9A of TMA 1970, HMRC may enquire into a taxpayer’s self-assessment return if they notify the taxpayer of their intention to do so:

  • up to the end of the period of 12 months after the day on which the return was delivered if the return was delivered on or before the filing date;
  • up to and including the quarter day next following the first anniversary of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll