header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012 / Adam Craggs
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Discovery channel

Adam Craggs analyses HMRC’s latest defeat in the First-tier Tribunal

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are able to raise what are colloquially called “discovery” assessments under s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970). This is a topical issue at the moment among tax practitioners and there have been a number of important cases in recent months. The latest taxpayer to successfully challenge the validity of a discovery assessment is Anthony While (While v HMRC [2012] UKFTT 58 (TC)).

Background

Before considering While’s case, it may be helpful to remind ourselves of the relevant statutory provisions. As readers will be aware, under s 9A of TMA 1970, HMRC may enquire into a taxpayer’s self-assessment return if they notify the taxpayer of their intention to do so:

  • up to the end of the period of 12 months after the day on which the return was delivered if the return was delivered on or before the filing date;
  • up to and including the quarter day next following the first anniversary of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll