Clyde & Co LLP and another v Van Winkelhof [2011] EWHC 668 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 270 (Mar)
Section 144(1) of the Equality Act 2010 rendered unenforceable an agreement to preclude or limit the continuation of sex discrimination proceedings before an employment tribunal unless reached in accordance with s 144(4) of that Act. An agreement to submit the dispute to arbitration was only enforceable if it satisfied the conditions in s 144(6).
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ
