header-logo header-logo

26 November 2021 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Discrimination by association: where next?

65089
An employment tribunal has given the first UK ruling on indirect associative discrimination: Charles Pigott reports
  • An employment tribunal has upheld an indirect associative discrimination claim from a worker who was caring for her disabled mother.
  • This is believed to be the first time that any UK court has interpreted the definition of indirect discrimination in favour of claimants who are not themselves members of the relevant protected group.

In Follows v Nationwide Building Society (Case No 2201937/2018V), the employment tribunal had to consider claims arising from the dismissal of Mrs J Follows on redundancy grounds by Nationwide Building Society.

Mrs Follows was a senior lending manager (SLM). She had a homeworking contract, but in conjunction with a redundancy programme which aimed to reduce the overall number of SLMs, Nationwide decided that she could no longer work from home. The reason given was that they needed ‘effective on-site supervision’ and that there were now too few SLMs to provide this, unless all SLMs came into the office full-time. The claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll