header-logo header-logo

28 November 2019 / Dr Paresh Kathrani
Issue: 7866 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Dispute Resolution & Conflict Avoidance Training in times of increasing complexity

12271
Disputes do arise. Between states, in businesses, within different sectors and in small knit groups, disagreements can happen, and they can have many unwelcome consequences

On some occasions, the issues at stake are so crucial that matters go to court. Litigation, of course, has its advantages. However, it is not the only way to resolve disputes. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques also exist. Such techniques include arbitration, adjudication in construction disputes and mediation.

Conflict avoidance is also as important as dispute resolution. Increasingly, people are looking to introduce methods that will prevent or minimise disruptions. Whether this be through the appointment of a board of experts to help parties understand the issues before they grow into a dispute, or specialists who can provide reports, conflict avoidance is another way in which to work with disputes.

It is in the nature of disputes that they can occur in almost any field. Politics, commerce, infrastructure, medicine, law—and the techniques mentioned above can all be useful in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll