header-logo header-logo

13 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Diversity on the up

Improvement in diversity of judicial recommendations

A quarter of the lawyers recently recommended for appointment as 28 Deputy District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts) were black, Asian or of an ethnic minority (BME).

Nearly 1,500 lawyers applied to the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) for the 28 posts available. BME lawyers made up 10% of the eligible pool, 18% of the applicants and 25% of successful applicants.

In contrast, BME lawyers made up only 12% of those selected for 26 roles in 2009, the last time the JAC selected Deputy District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts).

Women accounted for 46% of successful candidates, compared to 44% of the eligible pool—a slight improvement since the 2009 exercise.

They were also more successful than men in progressing from shortlisting to selection.

Applications from barristers more than doubled in comparison to the 2009 exercise, but solicitors who applied were as successful as barristers. The age of successful candidates has been recorded for the first time—three-quarters were aged 45 years or under, and seven were less than 35 years old.

Christopher Stephens, chairman of the JAC, says: “This gives an indication that lawyers are becoming judges younger than the public may perceive and in time for a career in the judiciary and to progress to more senior roles.

“Selections, as always, were made solely on merit and I am delighted to see such a strong performance from BME lawyers and continued good results for women.”

Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll