header-logo header-logo

23 August 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Divorce courts stalled by pensions reform uncertainty

Thousands of divorcing couples could be affected by chaos and delays in the family courts due to lingering uncertainty over the details of chancellor George Osborne’s changes to pension schemes

In the emergency budget, in June, the Chancellor announced a major change to the way the value of a pensions fund is calculated—that benefits from public sector pension schemes would increase in line with the CPI inflation index rather than the RPI inflation index.

According to family law firm Manches LLP, however, HM Revenue and Customs is yet to publish any detailed guidance either on the reform to public sector pensions or the extent to which private sector pension schemes may be expected to follow suit.

This means couples going through a divorce are unable to have their pension funds valued. The courts often ask for a snapshot valuation (known as a CETV) of each party’s pension fund so they can calculate the couple’s assets and decide whether to make a pension sharing order.

Manches LLP say the uncertainty “could potentially affect thousands of divorcing couples”, such as:

a couple negotiating an out-of-court amicable settlement, who must wait for confirmation of CETVs in order to negotiate terms; and

a couple with an imminent court hearing where confirmation of CETVs is required, who will need to have their hearing adjourned until guidance has been issued.

Joanne Edwards, a partner at Manches, says: “The family court system is already stretched to breaking point and is braced for further cuts.

“A lack of joined-up thinking now risks putting it under greater strain.”

Dani Glover, a pensions expert at Smith & Williamson, says: “Historically the CPI measure of inflation has tended to be lower than the RPI level of inflation.

“CETVs are likely to drop for members of public sector schemes as a consequence of the proposed changes. As a consequence of this announcement, most public sector schemes have suspended the quotation of CETVs and some have suspended the implementation of pension sharing orders.”

Guidance from HMRC could take up to three months to be provided, Glover said.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll