header-logo header-logo

Divorce & dissolution

04 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7757_hughes

It’s high time to modernise our divorce & dissolution laws & procedure, says Sarah Hughes

  • The law governing the divorce and dissolution procedure in England and Wales is out of date and out of touch with the way society has changed since the 1970s.

The law governing the divorce and dissolution procedure in England and Wales is contained within the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (re-enacting ss 1 and 2 of the Divorce Reform Act 1969) and supplemented by the Family Procedure Rules 2010.

It has long been recognised that the law in this area is out of date and out of touch with the way society has changed since the 1970s. However, despite numerous lobbying attempts by family lawyers and others, the law remains the same. Several procedural changes have been proposed, within the Family Procedure Rules 2010 and since, to try and modernise the way our legal system works. However, there is still a long way to go. This article outlines the recent changes and considers the further changes that still need to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll