header-logo header-logo

04 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Divorce & dissolution

nlj_7757_hughes

It’s high time to modernise our divorce & dissolution laws & procedure, says Sarah Hughes

  • The law governing the divorce and dissolution procedure in England and Wales is out of date and out of touch with the way society has changed since the 1970s.

The law governing the divorce and dissolution procedure in England and Wales is contained within the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (re-enacting ss 1 and 2 of the Divorce Reform Act 1969) and supplemented by the Family Procedure Rules 2010.

It has long been recognised that the law in this area is out of date and out of touch with the way society has changed since the 1970s. However, despite numerous lobbying attempts by family lawyers and others, the law remains the same. Several procedural changes have been proposed, within the Family Procedure Rules 2010 and since, to try and modernise the way our legal system works. However, there is still a long way to go. This article outlines the recent changes and considers the further changes that still need to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll