header-logo header-logo

DOLS in the doldrums

31 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The rights against deprivation of liberty of people who lack mental capacity and are in supported living are to be reviewed by the Law Commission.

People in hospitals and care homes have the protection of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), which allow them to be deprived of their liberty if it is in their best interests. However, DOLS do not apply to those in supported living.

The Commission will review this discrepancy, create a new legal framework and provide the government with information to improve DOLS.

DOLS have come under fire from several quarters, including a House of Lords Select Committee in March, which found the safeguards “not fit for purpose”.

Liverpool solicitor Peter Edwards said: “I do not believe DOLS are an effective protection.

“They could be, if worked on, and it’s a relief that the Law Commission is looking at both areas [DOLS and the need for protection for those in supported living].”

The meaning of “deprivation of liberty” for those who lack mental capacity was broadened by Baroness Hale in the Supreme Court case of Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19.

Edwards said that procedures to deprive people of their liberty were set out by DOLS, but that an appeal would take about a year and cost £30,000-£50,000. For people in supported living, permission needs to be sought from the Court of Protection before they can be deprived of liberty—a cumbersome process.

“What we need is a clear procedure with lots of safeguards where an individual can appeal through a cheap, accessible tribunal mechanism,” he said.

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll