header-logo header-logo

31 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

DOLS in the doldrums

The rights against deprivation of liberty of people who lack mental capacity and are in supported living are to be reviewed by the Law Commission.

People in hospitals and care homes have the protection of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), which allow them to be deprived of their liberty if it is in their best interests. However, DOLS do not apply to those in supported living.

The Commission will review this discrepancy, create a new legal framework and provide the government with information to improve DOLS.

DOLS have come under fire from several quarters, including a House of Lords Select Committee in March, which found the safeguards “not fit for purpose”.

Liverpool solicitor Peter Edwards said: “I do not believe DOLS are an effective protection.

“They could be, if worked on, and it’s a relief that the Law Commission is looking at both areas [DOLS and the need for protection for those in supported living].”

The meaning of “deprivation of liberty” for those who lack mental capacity was broadened by Baroness Hale in the Supreme Court case of Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19.

Edwards said that procedures to deprive people of their liberty were set out by DOLS, but that an appeal would take about a year and cost £30,000-£50,000. For people in supported living, permission needs to be sought from the Court of Protection before they can be deprived of liberty—a cumbersome process.

“What we need is a clear procedure with lots of safeguards where an individual can appeal through a cheap, accessible tribunal mechanism,” he said.

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll