header-logo header-logo

DOLS in the doldrums

31 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The rights against deprivation of liberty of people who lack mental capacity and are in supported living are to be reviewed by the Law Commission.

People in hospitals and care homes have the protection of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), which allow them to be deprived of their liberty if it is in their best interests. However, DOLS do not apply to those in supported living.

The Commission will review this discrepancy, create a new legal framework and provide the government with information to improve DOLS.

DOLS have come under fire from several quarters, including a House of Lords Select Committee in March, which found the safeguards “not fit for purpose”.

Liverpool solicitor Peter Edwards said: “I do not believe DOLS are an effective protection.

“They could be, if worked on, and it’s a relief that the Law Commission is looking at both areas [DOLS and the need for protection for those in supported living].”

The meaning of “deprivation of liberty” for those who lack mental capacity was broadened by Baroness Hale in the Supreme Court case of Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19.

Edwards said that procedures to deprive people of their liberty were set out by DOLS, but that an appeal would take about a year and cost £30,000-£50,000. For people in supported living, permission needs to be sought from the Court of Protection before they can be deprived of liberty—a cumbersome process.

“What we need is a clear procedure with lots of safeguards where an individual can appeal through a cheap, accessible tribunal mechanism,” he said.

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll