header-logo header-logo

02 September 2022 / Cris McCurley
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse & the family courts (Pt 2)

92261
Is there any hope on the horizon for much needed reform to the treatment of domestic abuse cases? Cris McCurley reports
  • The final report of the expert panel on risk of harm in private law children cases, coupled with a Court of Appeal judgment closely aligned to its findings, gave hope that change was finally coming to the family courts’ treatment of domestic abuse.
  • However, the recommendations risk falling by the wayside without proper funding and resources, putting thousands of domestic abuse victims in harm’s way.

The first coronavirus lockdown in March 2020 threw into stark relief the impact that over a decade of severe cuts to all parts of the family justice system has had in all areas. The cuts to the court estate and to judicial sitting days have led to the remaining courts having to soak up the additional demand from closed courts, causing inevitable delay. Legal aid for private family law cases was virtually obsolete, save for where the victim of abuse could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll