header-logo header-logo

02 September 2022 / Cris McCurley
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse & the family courts (Pt 2)

92261
Is there any hope on the horizon for much needed reform to the treatment of domestic abuse cases? Cris McCurley reports
  • The final report of the expert panel on risk of harm in private law children cases, coupled with a Court of Appeal judgment closely aligned to its findings, gave hope that change was finally coming to the family courts’ treatment of domestic abuse.
  • However, the recommendations risk falling by the wayside without proper funding and resources, putting thousands of domestic abuse victims in harm’s way.

The first coronavirus lockdown in March 2020 threw into stark relief the impact that over a decade of severe cuts to all parts of the family justice system has had in all areas. The cuts to the court estate and to judicial sitting days have led to the remaining courts having to soak up the additional demand from closed courts, causing inevitable delay. Legal aid for private family law cases was virtually obsolete, save for where the victim of abuse could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll