header-logo header-logo

Domestic abuse & the family courts (Pt 2)

02 September 2022 / Cris McCurley
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail
92261
Is there any hope on the horizon for much needed reform to the treatment of domestic abuse cases? Cris McCurley reports
  • The final report of the expert panel on risk of harm in private law children cases, coupled with a Court of Appeal judgment closely aligned to its findings, gave hope that change was finally coming to the family courts’ treatment of domestic abuse.
  • However, the recommendations risk falling by the wayside without proper funding and resources, putting thousands of domestic abuse victims in harm’s way.

The first coronavirus lockdown in March 2020 threw into stark relief the impact that over a decade of severe cuts to all parts of the family justice system has had in all areas. The cuts to the court estate and to judicial sitting days have led to the remaining courts having to soak up the additional demand from closed courts, causing inevitable delay. Legal aid for private family law cases was virtually obsolete, save for where the victim of abuse could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll