header-logo header-logo

02 September 2022 / Cris McCurley
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse & the family courts (Pt 2)

92261
Is there any hope on the horizon for much needed reform to the treatment of domestic abuse cases? Cris McCurley reports
  • The final report of the expert panel on risk of harm in private law children cases, coupled with a Court of Appeal judgment closely aligned to its findings, gave hope that change was finally coming to the family courts’ treatment of domestic abuse.
  • However, the recommendations risk falling by the wayside without proper funding and resources, putting thousands of domestic abuse victims in harm’s way.

The first coronavirus lockdown in March 2020 threw into stark relief the impact that over a decade of severe cuts to all parts of the family justice system has had in all areas. The cuts to the court estate and to judicial sitting days have led to the remaining courts having to soak up the additional demand from closed courts, causing inevitable delay. Legal aid for private family law cases was virtually obsolete, save for where the victim of abuse could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll