header-logo header-logo

08 July 2022 / Cris McCurley
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse & the family courts

87134
In the first of a two-part series, Cris McCurley examines key changes to the treatment of domestic abuse victims & their children within the family justice system
  • Over the years, a stream of reports, practice directions and inquiries has contributed to constant changes to the courts’ understanding and treatment of victims of domestic abuse and their children.
  • Recent recommendations for change, including substantial financial investment and a more trauma-focused approach, are to be welcomed, but still more work is needed.

The law concerning domestic abuse has been evolving over the last three decades, but the last three years have seen particularly significant changes.

In 2004, Women’s Aid published their report Twenty-nine child homicides: lessons still to be learnt on domestic violence and child protection, which considered the domestic homicide reviews of children murdered either during or as a result of court-ordered or approved contact. It led to the first version of Practice Direction 12J in 2010 under the presidency of the late Sir Nicholas Wall, who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll