header-logo header-logo

DPAs: time to extend the regime?

01 August 2019 / Eoin O’Shea , Emma Shafton
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
More than half a loaf: Tesco, Sarclad & the case for individual DPAs by Eoin O’Shea & Emma Shafton

A deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) is a means by which a prosecutor can resolve allegations of certain types of criminal behaviour by a corporation (Crime and Courts Act 2013, Sch 17). Instead of a prosecution and trial, the corporation agrees to disgorge any gains and pay additional penalties. It promises future good behaviour including, often, assisting prosecutors to investigate others. A prosecution is deferred pending fulfilment of these commitments. There have been five such DPAs so far, all proposed by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and approved of by the courts. The most recent, involving Serco Geographix Ltd, was issued last month (Serious Fraud Office v Serco Geographix Ltd, Southwark Crown Court 04/07/2019, (William Davis J)).

At present, DPAs can apply to corporate bodies only, but not to individuals. The best explanation for this is pragmatism: it can be very difficult to prosecute a company for serious crime, in particular where, under the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll