header-logo header-logo

01 August 2019 / Eoin O’Shea , Emma Shafton
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

DPAs: time to extend the regime?

More than half a loaf: Tesco, Sarclad & the case for individual DPAs by Eoin O’Shea & Emma Shafton

A deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) is a means by which a prosecutor can resolve allegations of certain types of criminal behaviour by a corporation (Crime and Courts Act 2013, Sch 17). Instead of a prosecution and trial, the corporation agrees to disgorge any gains and pay additional penalties. It promises future good behaviour including, often, assisting prosecutors to investigate others. A prosecution is deferred pending fulfilment of these commitments. There have been five such DPAs so far, all proposed by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and approved of by the courts. The most recent, involving Serco Geographix Ltd, was issued last month (Serious Fraud Office v Serco Geographix Ltd, Southwark Crown Court 04/07/2019, (William Davis J)).

At present, DPAs can apply to corporate bodies only, but not to individuals. The best explanation for this is pragmatism: it can be very difficult to prosecute a company for serious crime, in particular where, under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll