header-logo header-logo

DPP foregoes legal team

05 December 2018
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Max Hill QC, the new Director of Public Prosecutions, has dispensed with his team of legal advisers. Giving evidence to the Justice Select Committee this week, Hill said there were good reasons why his predecessor Keir Starmer had established the team but that he considered it his role to support prosecutors’ decisions rather than to take casework decisions. He said the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had reduced its staff numbers by 30% due to funding cuts, but had maintained its conviction rate at about 85%. However, he said the CPS could ‘absolutely not’ take any more cuts.

Issue: 7820 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll